drbg_generate_long

Chris Westervelt chris.westervelt at advantor.com
Wed May 17 14:38:33 CEST 2017


Not sure but I'll check.  I know that something was failing in the patched
version of 1.6.4 I had been working with from roughly a couple of years ago
so I'll test 1.7.3 and get back to you in a few

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephan Müller [mailto:smueller at chronox.de] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 9:47 PM
To: gcrypt-devel at gnupg.org
Cc: Chris Westervelt
Subject: Re: drbg_generate_long

Am Dienstag, 16. Mai 2017, 23:33:50 CEST schrieb Chris Westervelt:

Hi Chris,

> Are there any gotchas with 32 bit ARM vs 64 bit Intel you could see here?
> Two of RNG Vectors won't pass the baked in test

After checking the code, I do not see anything immediately obvious.

By any chance: does the DRBG work fine with version 1.7.3 (there was a big
change for the CTR DRBG introduced with 1.7.4)?


Ciao
Stephan

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5101 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20170517/a1448ee7/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the Gcrypt-devel mailing list