[SUGGESTION NEEDED] A request for suggestion on furthering the discussion over ElGamal
wk at gnupg.org
Thu Oct 19 13:57:04 CEST 2017
On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 03:35, gniibe at fsij.org said:
> It would be good to have elgamal-schnorr.c in libgcrypt, but I don't
> know if it's worth or not. Which application uses that?
I can't tell either. Let me note that for example GNUnet uses and used
modified versions of standard algorithms and they have not yet made it
into Libgcrypt as a "high-level" API. Thus they need to use lower level
functions of Libgcrypt to implement that - which of course works. When
we are getting to the point that those algorithms are in widespread use,
it will indeed make sense to implement a dedicated API for such an
> for me that we have better choice on a cyclic group other than Schnorr
> Group. Say, Elliptic curve?
GNUnet also moved away from DSA to EC derived algorithms.
Regarding the improper use of Elgamal, the Libgcrypt release
announcements tell this:
Thorough understanding of applied cryptography is required
to use Libgcrypt.
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Gcrypt-devel