[SUGGESTION NEEDED] A request for suggestion on furthering the discussion over ElGamal
w.k at berkeley.edu
Thu Oct 19 18:29:05 CEST 2017
But will "
Thorough understanding of applied cryptography is required
to use Libgcrypt."
be an effective warning rather than just a disclaimer?
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:57 AM, Werner Koch <wk at gnupg.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2017 03:35, gniibe at fsij.org said:
>> It would be good to have elgamal-schnorr.c in libgcrypt, but I don't
>> know if it's worth or not. Which application uses that?
> I can't tell either. Let me note that for example GNUnet uses and used
> modified versions of standard algorithms and they have not yet made it
> into Libgcrypt as a "high-level" API. Thus they need to use lower level
> functions of Libgcrypt to implement that - which of course works. When
> we are getting to the point that those algorithms are in widespread use,
> it will indeed make sense to implement a dedicated API for such an
>> for me that we have better choice on a cyclic group other than Schnorr
>> Group. Say, Elliptic curve?
> GNUnet also moved away from DSA to EC derived algorithms.
> Regarding the improper use of Elgamal, the Libgcrypt release
> announcements tell this:
> Thorough understanding of applied cryptography is required
> to use Libgcrypt.
> Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
Weikeng Chen @ 795 Soda Hall
More information about the Gcrypt-devel