USB vendor ID 0000 on Blue Pill

[Marian Buschsieweke]

Hi,

imho the new naming convention suggested by Peter Lebbing is more obvious and
has the advantage to remain compatible with old HowTos.

Also, I personally believe there is no harm in building building both versions
by default. This also seems to me the more common case that users want the
image with vid & pid included, so it would be nice to have this case covered by
default.

Kind regards,
Marian

-------------------------------------------------------------
M.Sc. Marian Buschsieweke
Dept. Communication and Networked Systems (ComSys)
Institute for Intelligent Cooperating Systems (IKS)
Otto-von-Guericke-University of Magdeburg
Universitätsplatz 2, Building 29, Room 314
39106 Magdeburg
Germany

http://www.comsys.ovgu.de/Team/Marian+Buschsieweke.html
Tel.: +49 - 391 - 67 - 52673
Fax:  +49 - 391 - 67 - 41161

-------------------------------------------------------------

On Mon, 9 Apr 2018 10:55:23 +0200
Peter Lebbing <peter at digitalbrains.com> wrote:

> On 09/04/18 04:15, NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
> > Or... is it better to default to the image with VID-PID, changing the
> > last step to generate distribution image withno VID-PID?  I wonder.  
> 
> Right now, you explicitly name the image /with/ a VID and PID. But maybe
> people will pick up quicker on the way it works when you explicitly name
> the image /without/ a VID and PID.
> 
> Instead of
> gnuk.bin/.hex/.elf/...
> gnuk-vidpid.bin/.hex/.elf/...
> 
> Name them
> gnuk-novidpid.bin/...
> gnuk.bin/...
> 
> That way, the name is a red flag to anyone trying to flash the former,
> and they will consult the documentation to find out what step they are
> missing.
> 
> HTH,
> 
> Peter.
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnuk-users/attachments/20180409/d1d19164/attachment.sig>