dates and their representation
raf at comdyn.com.au
Wed Sep 23 12:57:51 CEST 1998
>Michael Deindl <olmur at dwarf.bb.bawue.de> writes:
>> I want to support this suggestion: local time is usually a good idea
>> and should be the default. But having an option to switch to UTC is a
>Here is the reason, why I do not like time conversion:
>pub 1024D/57548DCD 1998-07-07 Werner Koch (gnupg sig) <dd9jn at gnu.org>
>This may get listed as -07-08 or -07-06 depending on the timezone.
>I think that this could lead to some confusion if two persons list the
>key but get different times (yes they are not different really, but it
i don't understand. how can it lead to confusion
if these two people are in different timezones?
More information about the Gnupg-devel