rabbi at quickie.net
Mon Aug 14 20:48:35 CEST 2000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Sure. But I still don't think I ought to be able to encrypt to a revoked
On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Frank Tobin wrote:
> L. Sassaman, at 22:21 on Fri, 11 Aug 2000, wrote:
> > (Or I could be mis-diagnosing the error, and it could be caused by
> > pgpenvelope. But I think there's still GnuPG confusion, since a revoked
> > subkey should be unusable for encryption.)
> Really, now, Len, you shouldn't be relying on pgpenvelope for your
> diagnosing of GnuPG :) pgpenvelope is at fault here, and I am aware of
> the problem; pgpenvelope currently simply selects the first subkey. This
> is a problem, and I'll fix it.
> Frank Tobin http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/
> "To learn what is good and what is to be valued,
> those truths which cannot be shaken or changed." Myst: The Book of Atrus
System Administrator | "And all our yesterdays
Technology Consultant | have lighted fools..."
icq.. 10735603 |
pgp.. finger://ns.quickie.net/rabbi | --Shakespeare
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred.
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Gnupg-devel