Subkey problems

[L. Sassaman]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sure. But I still don't think I ought to be able to encrypt to a revoked
subkey, period.

On Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Frank Tobin wrote:

> L. Sassaman, at 22:21 on Fri, 11 Aug 2000, wrote:
> 
> > (Or I could be mis-diagnosing the error, and it could be caused by
> > pgpenvelope. But I think there's still GnuPG confusion, since a revoked
> > subkey should be unusable for encryption.)
> 
> Really, now, Len, you shouldn't be relying on pgpenvelope for your
> diagnosing of GnuPG :)  pgpenvelope is at fault here, and I am aware of
> the problem; pgpenvelope currently simply selects the first subkey.  This
> is a problem, and I'll fix it.
> 
> -- 
> Frank Tobin		http://www.uiuc.edu/~ftobin/
> 
> "To learn what is good and what is to be valued,
> those truths which cannot be shaken or changed."  Myst: The Book of Atrus
> 
> 

__

L. Sassaman

System Administrator                |  "And all our yesterdays
Technology Consultant               |   have lighted fools..."
icq.. 10735603                      |  
pgp.. finger://ns.quickie.net/rabbi |          --Shakespeare







-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred.

iD8DBQE5mK+JPYrxsgmsCmoRAmPQAKDNkl6fg++jqbKo+shwJfLA71ZLzwCg7d/f
c6sP1JUFz3EzhTByrd++FAE=
=otpM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----