OS/2 Port

Ralf Hildebrandt Ralf.Hildebrandt at innominate.de
Tue Jun 13 16:36:02 CEST 2000

On Tue, Jun 13, 2000 at 11:09:54PM +1000, Brian Havard wrote:

> These arguments are really bogus. All the other mailing lists I'm involved
> with DO set the Reply-To field and it's never been a problem. Maybe it's
> because my mailer has this super-advanced feature where if From != Reply-To
> it offers the choice of which to send to. When I use the group reply
> function the sender gets 2 copies, 1 direct & 1 via the list, wasting his &
> my bandwidth.

If you have a super-advanced mailer, why don't you use "L" for list-reply?
But then you don't use mutt :)

Ralf Hildebrandt <R.Hildebrandt at tu-bs.de> www.stahl.bau.tu-bs.de/~hildeb
A mathematician is an engine for converting coffee into theorems.

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list