ndt at jps.net
Mon Sep 4 08:10:36 CEST 2000
Sam Roberts wrote:
> Quoting Nathan Thompson-Amato <ndt at jps.net>, who wrote:
> > But is it worth implementing? RFC 2015 seems to provide equivalent
> > functionality, it's an actual RFC, and (this is the important one)
> > it's already implemented in my favorite client :-) . Are there
> > plans to update mutt and elm to support RFC 2015?
> RFC 2015 is supported by butt, as well as application/pgp (with
> a note about it being heavily discouraged). Don't know about elm.
Thanks for the tip -- I must've missed that FAQ. David
Champion and Charles Duffy wrote me with similar info, and
David also mentioned that elm-me+ also does RFC 2015. So
it looks like Evolution will just support the RFC and not
More information about the Gnupg-devel