application/pgp RFC

Nathan Thompson-Amato ndt at
Mon Sep 4 08:10:36 CEST 2000

Sam Roberts wrote:
> Quoting Nathan Thompson-Amato <ndt at>, who wrote:
> > But is it worth implementing?  RFC 2015 seems to provide equivalent
> > functionality, it's an actual RFC, and (this is the important one)
> > it's already implemented in my favorite client :-) .  Are there
> >  plans to update mutt and elm to support RFC 2015?
> RFC 2015 is supported by butt, as well as application/pgp (with
> a note about it being heavily discouraged). Don't know about elm.

Thanks for the tip -- I must've missed that FAQ.  David
Champion and Charles Duffy wrote me with similar info, and
David also mentioned that elm-me+ also does RFC 2015.  So
it looks like Evolution will just support the RFC and not

Thanks all,


More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list