application/pgp RFC

[Sam Roberts]

Quoting Nathan Thompson-Amato <ndt at jps.net>, who wrote:
> > On 2000-08-31 17:57:33 -0500, Taral wrote:
> > For guidance on how to implement it, please look at elm-me+ or mutt.
> 
> But is it worth implementing?  RFC 2015 seems to provide equivalent
> functionality, it's an actual RFC, and (this is the important one)
> it's already implemented in my favorite client :-) .  Are there
>  plans to update mutt and elm to support RFC 2015?

RFC 2015 is supported by butt, as well as application/pgp (with
a note about it being heavily discouraged). Don't know about elm.

Sam

-- 
Sam Roberts, sroberts at uniserve dot com, www.emyr.net/Sam
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 234 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20000902/157c16da/attachment.bin