Sig classification (was Re: discussion on increasing amount of gpg signatures...)

[David Shaw]

On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 11:12:04PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 01:25:52PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> 
> >  sig 1      3CB3B415 2001-10-14  David M. Shaw <dshaw at jabberwocky.com>
> >  sig 2      3CB3B415 2001-10-14  David M. Shaw <dshaw at jabberwocky.com>
> >  sig 3      3CB3B415 2001-10-14  David M. Shaw <dshaw at jabberwocky.com>
> 
> It would be nice if these could be presented more clearly.  I can't
> actually suggest a clearer way off-hand, mind you.

Heh.  I had the same thought.  I thought about using letters, but it
was even worse.  At least numbers have the advantage of making a "3"
clearly higher than a "2".

> Also, it would be
> nice if there were no space between the "sig" and the digit as in
> current output.

Try a --check-sigs.  That space is taken for the sig status character.

David

-- 
   David Shaw  |  dshaw at jabberwocky.com  |  WWW http://www.jabberwocky.com/
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
   "There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
      We don't believe this to be a coincidence." - Jeremy S. Anderson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 536 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20011015/091af6fc/attachment.bin