Sig classification (was Re: discussion on increasing amount of gpg signatures...)

Mark Brown broonie at
Mon Oct 15 02:26:01 CEST 2001

On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 07:01:16PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:

> > Also, it would be
> > nice if there were no space between the "sig" and the digit as in
> > current output.

> Try a --check-sigs.  That space is taken for the sig status character.

That's what I was thinking of :-) .  At present there's no space before
any extra data on the type of entity being listed.  With your patch this
would change.  Not that one ought to be attempting machine parsing of
the output of anything not --with-colons, but anyway.

"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20011015/7962ff72/attachment.bin

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list