gpgme 0.3.3 questions
Stephane Corthesy
stephane at sente.ch
Fri Sep 21 10:54:01 CEST 2001
Hi,
I have a few questions about gpgme 0.3.3, and gpg in general.
About gpg:
- Can subkeys have fingerprints?
- How are two keys equal? Can we compare them using fingerprint?
What makes them unique?
About gpgme:
- How are two GpgmeTrustItem equal? Can we compare them using their
GPGME_ATTR_KEYID attribute?
- What is the GPGME_ATTR_TYPE of a gpgme_trust_item? What does it
stand for?
- Which GpgmeData types can be read/written?
- GpgmeData read callback: can the callback return no data, but
without being at EOF?
- gpgme_data_read(_data, NULL, 0, &aReadLength): "Returns the number
of bytes available and does not move the read pointer.".
- Does aReadLength return the total number of bytes it can read,
or the number of bytes it read, or the number of bytes still to be
read?
- Can it return Gpgme_EOF_error?
- gpgme_release_context() "releases all resources": what are these
resources? Keys, trustItems, datas?
- GpgmeContext passphrase callback: can we expect to always have
description on three lines? "TRY_AGAIN" or "ENTER", userID or "[User
ID hint missing]" (does it mean that keyID was not included?), ???
(what is it?) or "[passphrase info missing]", always unlocalized.
- GpgmeContext progress callback: what is the type parameter? When
is the callback used? On key generation only?
- gpgme_strerror(): is it meant to be localized in future versions?
- After gpgme_op_import(), how can we get imported keys?
- Does gpgme_op_trustlist_next() really return GPGME_EOF when it has
finished enumeration?
Some remarks on the current implementation of gpgme:
- GpgmeKey misses GPGME_ATTR_EXPIRE attribute
- GpgmeKey misses two functions: gpgme_key_subkeys_count() and
gpgme_key_userids_count(). We cannot base counts on results returned
by gpgme_key_get_ulong_attr() or gpgme_key_get_string_attr(), because
0 and NULL can be valid values, depending on the attribute.
- Can subkeys be secret? If YES, then gpgme_key_get_ulong_attr() and
gpgme_key_get_string_attr() return only main key secretness.
- GpgmeData: currently there is no way to get data without it to be
released (gpgme_data_release_and_get_mem()).
- gpgme_set_textmode(): comment is outdated, because RFC2015 is no
longer valid, and has been replaced by RFC3156, in which you no
longer need to use textmode.
- gpgme misses a way to edit keys
- It would be nice to be able to give other options to gpg with
gpgme, like throwKeyID, etc. (important for mails with BCC)
- What is the roadmap for future versions of gpgme? I really like it!!
After playing with it, I suspect some bugs (I can't confirm them
yet, I'll check this later; maybe these are bugs in my code):
- When asking a GpgmeKey for one of its sub-userIDs (index > 0)
GPGME_ATTR_EMAIL attribute, it returns the name + email, whereas for
the main (index = 0) userID it returns only the email.
- When returning a GpgmeKey GPGME_ATTR_COMMENT attribute, characters
like ":" are not un-escaped, they are returned as \x3a
- When asking a GpgmeKey its main userID (index = 0), it returns the
last userID it was asked (can be a sub, or the main).
Finally, I needed to patch a file to make gpgme run tests: modify
tests/mkdemodirs:
< [ -d $name ] && rm -r $name
> [ -d $name ] && rm -r $name || true
On MacOS X Server (a BSD 4.3 bastard...), the mkdemodirs returns
with status -1 if directory does not exist.
Stephane Corthesy
GPGME - an Objective-C framework based on gpgme
http://macgpg.sourceforge.net/
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list