Possible GPG signature-check bug

David Shaw dshaw at jabberwocky.com
Thu Apr 18 20:25:01 CEST 2002

On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 12:18:28PM -0500, Larry Ellis wrote:
> Thanks for this...
> Let me see if I understand you correctly.
> It seems you're suggesting that both of these signatures are being applied
> by GPG to the text file, as opposed to one being applied to the text file
> and one applying to the other signature.  Is that correct?


> If that is the case, is this as it should be?  If so, does that mean GPG
> does not handle any sort of compound signatures?   Seems like a desirable
> feature.

I'm not sure what you mean here by "compound signatures"?  Do you mean
signatures on a signature, or multiple signatures on a given document?
Which were you trying to do?


   David Shaw  |  dshaw at jabberwocky.com  |  WWW http://www.jabberwocky.com/
   "There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and UNIX.
      We don't believe this to be a coincidence." - Jeremy S. Anderson

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list