Again: Changes from 1.0.6 to 1.0.7

Stéphane Corthésy stephane at
Thu Jun 20 23:11:01 CEST 2002

On Thursday, June 20, 2002, at 09:47  PM, Werner Koch wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 21:00:50 +0200, Stéphane Corthésy said:
>>> gpg --recipient RECIPIENT_1 --recipient RECIPIENT_2 --batch --no-tty
>>> --charset iso-8859-1 --textmode --armor --encrypt
>>> With gpg 1.0.6, if one of the keys was not signed by me, command
>>> returned an error. This is no longer the case with gpg 1.0.7, but
> By error you mean the return code of the gpg process?

Yes. I know I don't use gpg the correct way, I'd better use the 
status-fd; I'll do it when using gpgme, in a future version.


More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list