In response to Bernd Eckenfels firstname.lastname@example.org
lists at lina.inka.de
Thu Nov 7 22:47:02 CET 2002
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 08:40:34AM +0000, Noel D. Torres Taño wrote:
> The first is LSSI (LSSICE), the new spanish Internet law. It's worse
> than DMCA in certain aspects: my e-mails and web navigation can be
> accessed WITHOUT a judicial order.
There is no problem with this, because you communicate encrypted and only
with hashes. In fact Internet access is as untrusted as mail and http is.
> That's worse: they must be logged by
> the ISP and maintained during a year.
Which is good in case of a time stamping service anyway.
> The second is simply not to
> overload Internet. The e-mail you sent me has EIGHT "Received" header
Millions of email messages are transfered by email, a few more wont
> Again: let the user NOT TO USE E-MAIL AT ALL.
Yes, but this does not change the fact that others think it is one of the
> I'll write a new feature-proposal/protocol-proposal taking that idea I
> feel good.
And your new prooposel wont use Internet?
> What do you refer? Sorry, I don't understand that completely (remember
> I'm not english native speaker).
E-Mail servers are easy to set up, available, and even systems with a lot of
load distributed systems (equal cost mx records) are easy.
More information about the Gnupg-devel