solved

[Werner Koch]

On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 18:19:17 +0100, Bernhard Reiter said:

> So you are saying that scdaemon should be a package on its own?
> Currently it is put in the gpgsm package.
> Which application is using scdaemon, besides gpg-agent
> for openpgp and smime access over pcsc?

None so war.  However eventually Poldi (the smart card PAM module)
will make use of scdaemon.  Thus from a strategic point of view it
should be its own package.  

Putting it into gpgsm is definitely wrong; thus gpg-agent would be
better.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner