a small feature request
md at Linux.IT
Thu Feb 24 18:48:30 CET 2005
On Feb 24, David Shaw <dshaw at jabberwocky.com> wrote:
> I've always resisted this, using the logic that if a server operator
> doesn't actually *need* to know the GnuPG version, why give it to
This should be obvious: to help tracking misbehaving clients.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : /pipermail/attachments/20050224/62425ee0/attachment.pgp
More information about the Gnupg-devel