Need help compiling gpgme fat

Stéphane Corthésy stephane at sente.ch
Sat Mar 11 19:58:39 CET 2006


Hi,

On Mar 6, 2006, at 10:46 , Marcus Brinkmann wrote:

> At Sun, 5 Mar 2006 18:49:20 +0100,
> Stéphane Corthésy wrote:
>> I've just downloaded latest libtool (1.5.22), and replaced
>> config.guess, config.sub, install-sh and ltmain.sh, applied my
>> previous patch on generated libtool, and now it works :-) I can now
>> build libgpgme for both ppc and intel in one pass/one lib.
>> (maybe my patch is not even needed, I haven't tried yet without it)
>> When will you upgrade your libtool (as well as gpg's, as I guess
>> there is the same problem when trying to compile gpg as fat binary)?
>
> Yeah, it seems there is now fatting support in libtool.  I have
> upgraded libgpg-error now to latest automake and libtool.


Thanks.


>   Can you
> please test this from SVN?  (See README.CVS for details).


OK. Done.

I still need to apply my patch (the search path for libs is not  
correct; it doesn't search for fat libs, only installed libs - which  
are not fat); I filed a bug report to libtool people, and they are  
investigating the problem.


> If this works for you (without any custom patches), I can update GPGME
> as well, for a second test.
>
> Thanks,
> Marcus
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-devel mailing list
> Gnupg-devel at gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel


Regards,

Stéphane




More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list