doc, gpgme: should'nt GPGME_DEBUG be mentioned

Marcus Brinkmann marcus.brinkmann at
Fri Sep 12 21:57:04 CEST 2008

At Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:05:36 +0200,
Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> [1  <multipart/signed (7bit)>]
> [1.1  <text/plain; iso-8859-1 (quoted-printable)>]
> Just checking the gpgme docs, shouldn't GPGME_DEBUG be mentioned there?
> There are some traces of if in the NEWS file, but nothing in the .info.

The debug output is not yet complete and consistent across the GPGME
functionality.  Reading it can be extremely confusing if you don't
know the internals very well (and even then some guessing is involved
due to the lack of completeness).


More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list