doc, gpgme: should'nt GPGME_DEBUG be mentioned

Bernhard Reiter bernhard at
Mon Sep 15 09:51:01 CEST 2008


On Friday 12 September 2008 21:57, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> At Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:05:36 +0200,
> Bernhard Reiter wrote:

> > Just checking the gpgme docs, shouldn't GPGME_DEBUG be mentioned there?
> > There are some traces of if in the NEWS file, but nothing in the .info.

thanks for responding! 

> The debug output is not yet complete and consistent across the GPGME
> functionality.  Reading it can be extremely confusing if you don't
> know the internals very well (and even then some guessing is involved
> due to the lack of completeness).

Looks like the paragraph above can go directly in as part of the 
documentation. :)

Please, please document GPGME_DEBUG! I am searching for it too often,
a little paragraph should be easy to write. 


Managing Director - Owner:       (Free Software Company)
Germany Coordinator: Coordinator:
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998
Geschäftsführer Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1603 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20080915/7d11f48b/attachment.bin>

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list