doc, gpgme: should'nt GPGME_DEBUG be mentioned
bernhard at intevation.de
Mon Sep 15 09:51:01 CEST 2008
On Friday 12 September 2008 21:57, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> At Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:05:36 +0200,
> Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> > Just checking the gpgme docs, shouldn't GPGME_DEBUG be mentioned there?
> > There are some traces of if in the NEWS file, but nothing in the .info.
thanks for responding!
> The debug output is not yet complete and consistent across the GPGME
> functionality. Reading it can be extremely confusing if you don't
> know the internals very well (and even then some guessing is involved
> due to the lack of completeness).
Looks like the paragraph above can go directly in as part of the
Please, please document GPGME_DEBUG! I am searching for it too often,
a little paragraph should be easy to write.
Managing Director - Owner: www.intevation.net (Free Software Company)
Germany Coordinator: fsfeurope.org. Coordinator: www.Kolab-Konsortium.com.
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998
Geschäftsführer Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 1603 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Gnupg-devel