un-trusting MD5 in gpg
wk at gnupg.org
Thu May 7 19:36:58 CEST 2009
On Thu, 7 May 2009 19:14, dkg at fifthhorseman.net said:
> Can you explain what the problem is with having a more-specific error
> code? We're talking about introducing new semantics in gpg already.
> Why not have an error code that specifically refers to those semantics?
There are already too many different error codes out of histroical
reasons. Over the time I learned that many orf them are not very
usefule, whereas others are too broad. These error codes are not only
for displaying someting to a user but mainly used as a small-bandwidth
notification system. GnuPG acts on certain error codes and I can't see
how it should behave different on a disabled and a blacklisted also. In
fact I am not sure whether we need them at all, we can display a custom
message to the user (or via --status-fd) and internally use the error
code for unknown algorithm.
Die Gedanken sind frei. Auschnahme regelt ein Bundeschgesetz.
More information about the Gnupg-devel