Fix few warnings in libgcrypt/cipher
wk at gnupg.org
Wed Dec 14 13:55:22 CET 2011
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 10:02, phcoder at gmail.com said:
> Nobody seems to care. Is it a wrong list for libgcrypt patches? If so
> what would be the right one?
gcrypt-devel would be better; but I read both.
I briefly looked at your patch but I am not convinced about the change.
In particular because you say that it does not impact on performance.
On what systems and CPUs did you tested it?
To apply a patch to Libgcrypt we need a copyright assignment to the FSF.
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
More information about the Gnupg-devel