Why 2.1 is delayed for so long

Werner Koch wk at gnupg.org
Mon Sep 22 18:45:03 CEST 2014

On Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:14, dshaw at jabberwocky.com said:

> I basically agree with this.

Me too.

> Of course, --expert would have everything and give all options,
> including setting key flags, as today.  But without --expert, just
> make an RSA (sign+certify) + RSA (encrypt) key, as is the default
> today.

I wonder whether a sign only key (and then being able to select between
DSA or RSA) makes sense in non-expert mode.  What do you think?

Shall we add a line "For more options run gpg with --expert"?



Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list