Why 2.1 is delayed for so long
wk at gnupg.org
Sat Sep 27 15:01:53 CEST 2014
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014 05:29, dshaw at jabberwocky.com said:
> thought, perhaps not "--expert". That is, make up some new option to
> show the full key generation list. (or even a different command:
> "--gen-key" vs "--gen-key-full" perhaps?) The reason why I'm
I implemented this:
$ g10/gpg2 -v --gen-key
gpg (GnuPG) 2.1.0-beta849; Copyright (C) 2014 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.
There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
Note: Use "gpg --full-gen-key" for a full featured key generation dialog.
GnuPG needs to construct a user ID to identify your key.
Real name: Kit Fielding
Email address: kit at dickfrancis.null
You selected this USER-ID:
"Kit Fielding <kit at dickfrancis.null>"
Change (N)ame, (E)mail, or (O)kay/(Q)uit? o
We need to generate a lot of random bytes. It is a good idea to perform
pub rsa2048/7BD0D1C1 2014-09-27
Key fingerprint = 56B6 8B1E 36C5 AD87 148F BDCD 4C4D 9B18 7BD0 D1C1
uid [ unknown] Kit Fielding <kit at dickfrancis.null>
sub rsa2048/39BAD417 2014-09-27
--gen-full-key is indetical to the old one. Using --gen-key with
--batch is also not affected.
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
More information about the Gnupg-devel