Encrypting / Signing the mail subject?
mnyromyr at tprac.de
Fri Jan 16 21:11:19 CET 2015
Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> If you want to call something with a 70-year track record a "bad
> workaround," well, that's on you.
"We always did it like this" is not actually a valid point, but hey …
>> Hence [OpenPGP] should evolve.
My "it" and "protocol" wasn't exactly meant as "OpenPGP in general", but
"PGP mail", hence I have no problem with:
> Leave RFC4880 alone, please, it's not an
> email protocol. Put this out in the email RFCs somewhere, like
> RFC3156. RFC3156 describes how to use OpenPGP with MIME, but it
> doesn't actually define anything about the OpenPGP standard itself.
Freiheit stirbt | Fsayannes SF&F-Bibliothek:
Mit Sicherheit | http://fsayanne.tprac.de/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Gnupg-devel