Encrypting / Signing the mail subject?

[Karsten Düsterloh]

Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> If you want to call something with a 70-year track record a "bad 
> workaround," well, that's on you.

"We always did it like this" is not actually a valid point, but hey …

>> Hence [OpenPGP] should evolve.

My "it" and "protocol" wasn't exactly meant as "OpenPGP in general", but
"PGP mail", hence I have no problem with:

> Leave RFC4880 alone, please, it's not an
> email protocol.  Put this out in the email RFCs somewhere, like
> RFC3156. RFC3156 describes how to use OpenPGP with MIME, but it
> doesn't actually define anything about the OpenPGP standard itself.

I know.


Karsten
-- 
       Freiheit stirbt        |       Fsayannes SF&F-Bibliothek:
            Mit Sicherheit    |       http://fsayanne.tprac.de/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20150116/21ac97df/attachment.sig>