Memory Hole discussion / OpenPGP e-mail header protection

[Ruben Pollan]

Quoting Alexander Strobel (2015-06-23 17:27:29)
> One question regarding the specs: Did you talk about a version field? I
> think it might be easier to distinguish between emails from different
> implementation stages. I think this would also be helpful for debugging
> purposes after the initial release 1.0 .

You are right, it might be a good idea. We could add a 'Memory-Hole' header with 
the version, and this might be the place to add more info if needed in the 
future. This could be placed at the text/rfc822-headers attachment.

-- 
Ruben Pollan  | http://meskio.net/
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 My contact info: http://meskio.net/crypto.txt
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Nos vamos a Croatan.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20150623/7e5a107f/attachment-0001.sig>