Fingerprints and Key-IDs
Werner Koch
wk at gnupg.org
Sat Aug 6 17:56:19 CEST 2016
On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 16:06, ilf at zeromail.org said:
> I assume that the option --keyid-format was first "widely" used to
> mitigate from --keyid-format "short" to "long" after the first
12 years ago:
Noteworthy changes in version 1.3.6 (2004-05-22)
------------------------------------------------
* New --keyid-format option that selects short (99242560), long
(DB698D7199242560), 0xshort (0x99242560), or 0xlong
(0xDB698D7199242560) keyid displays. This lets users tune the
display to what they prefer.
We simply can't remove that.
> But as dkg has argued in 2013, we should move away from --keyid-format
> "short" *and* "long". Which is why "none" was introduced and is now
9 years after we first suggested that ;-)
> 2.b. Long term: Remove the parameter entirely.
Long term is to use 2.1 and that defaults to the new format.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
/* Join us at OpenPGP.conf <https://openpgp-conf.org> */
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list