Problems with pip install gpg
Werner Koch
wk at gnupg.org
Thu Dec 22 12:07:10 CET 2016
On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:39, bre at pagekite.net said:
> My point was that if the bindings were more accessible to developers,
> developers would be more likely to use them. You guys are really
> close, but
What I don't understand is why a _developer_ has problems to do the
usual
./configure && make
followed by a
make install
as user with appropriate permissions. This used to be one of the first
advanced things you learned as a sysadmin. I can't imagine that a
Python developer is missing these basic abilities. And if it is about
the time this takes: reading the manual and come up with an idea on how
to use a library will for sure take more time. Or are we living in a
copy+paste examples world now?
But well, I as one of these gray haired Unix folks I have a hard time
realizing that a shell is not anymore the basic interface for a
hacker. (cf. today's <https://lwn.net/Articles/709769/>)
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20161222/ec5230bd/attachment.sig>
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list