python bindings for gpgme

Bernhard Reiter bernhard at
Wed Jun 1 09:30:29 CEST 2016

Hi dkg,

Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 23:10:01 schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor:
> > So far I haven't done a comparison between pygpgme and pyme.
> > From my point of view the most pythonic one should be used.
> > pygpgme is already available for python3 for a few years longer than
> > pyme, I believe.
> i've been using pygpgme for a few years now, including some of that with
> python3.  I'd really like there to be one officially-supported python
> gpgme binding, and it should absolutely have stable python 3 support.

how important is the criteria "pythonic" to you?
Do you view pygpgme compared to pyme? 
(I guess you will have looked at both at least a little bit.)


--   +49 541 33 508 3-3
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998
Geschäftsführer Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20160601/77e379bb/attachment.sig>

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list