GPG_NAME vs. --gpg2-is-gpg vs. documentation vs. installation
Werner Koch
wk at gnupg.org
Wed Mar 30 17:03:09 CEST 2016
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:53, dkg at fifthhorseman.net said:
> configure.ac defines a GPG_NAME variable that determines what we call
> gpg. it also offers a --gpg2-is-gpg option, which sets the config
GPG_NAME allow to re-brand GnuPG. Here it is not due to trademark
problems but simply because I had a customer who wanted GnUPG but under
a different name. Thus I generalized this.
I can't remember the origin of --gpg2-is-gpg option but it was either due
to our old and unmaintained port to WindowsCE 3.5 or for Windows.
> In addition to this, much of the documentation hard-codes "gpg2" or
> "gpgv2", as do some embedded strings and help messages.
Ooops.
> once at ./configure time (--gpg2-is-gpg seems like a good place for
That is probably the easiest to do.
> Any thoughts about making this sort of change? I can supply a few
> patches in this direction that should improve things, but i don't know
Yes, it should indeed be done. Given that I did all the work for
re-branding it is likely easier if I go and fix that.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
More information about the Gnupg-devel
mailing list