running all the tests

Kristian Fiskerstrand kristian.fiskerstrand at sumptuouscapital.com
Tue Aug 8 10:12:51 CEST 2017


On 08/08/2017 09:58 AM, Werner Koch wrote:

> 
> Still, I doubt that users will catch and report make check failures from
> testing a bunch of combinations of non-standard configurations. 

Gentoo's tinderboxes running various use flag combinations has a
relatively good chance to find issues of this sort.

> 
> I would prefer if build systems, which are based on some kind of
> configure script, could agree on a name for enabling such tests.
> --enable-extensive-tests or --enable-all-tests might be good candidate
> names.  Thus it is up the the user to decide whether to run those tests.
> 

We can make that work.

-- 
----------------------------
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Blog: https://blog.sumptuouscapital.com
Twitter: @krifisk
----------------------------
Public OpenPGP keyblock at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
----------------------------
Nil satis nisi optimum
Nothing but the best is good enough

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20170808/927bcee6/attachment.sig>


More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list