installing gnupg 2.2 as "gpg", vs coexistence with gpg 1.4

Werner Koch wk at
Tue Oct 10 08:49:47 CEST 2017

On Mon,  9 Oct 2017 16:28, dkg at said:

> I'm not saying there are no cases where GnuPG's "classic" model could
> possibly be useful; but i'm saying that asking upstream to maintain two
> divergent branches indefinitely may not be the best use of the

Right.  However, I promised to keep on maintaining 1.4 so that it can be
used on some uncommon platforms and also to decrypt old files.

Let's track this as



Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20171010/0537905f/attachment.sig>

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list