installing gnupg 2.2 as "gpg", vs coexistence with gpg 1.4

[Werner Koch]

On Mon,  9 Oct 2017 16:28, dkg at fifthhorseman.net said:

> I'm not saying there are no cases where GnuPG's "classic" model could
> possibly be useful; but i'm saying that asking upstream to maintain two
> divergent branches indefinitely may not be the best use of the

Right.  However, I promised to keep on maintaining 1.4 so that it can be
used on some uncommon platforms and also to decrypt old files.

Let's track this as https://dev.gnupg.org/T3443


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner


-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20171010/0537905f/attachment.sig>