pinentry's new window titles could be more (less?) informative
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
dkg at fifthhorseman.net
Fri Oct 13 01:03:43 CEST 2017
On Fri 2017-09-29 11:00:51 +0200, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 20:03, rjh at sixdemonbag.org said:
>> So my question is, yes, I see what the intent is here: to give users
>> some assurance their PIN is being requested by the program they expect.
> Actually the reason I implemented this was to see the ssh invocation. I
> have a few cron jobs connecting to other boxes running and thus it is
> interesting to see which kicked the pinentry.
I understand this desire, but i think the concerns raised in the rest of
this thread still stand.
Can we figure out some path forward that will make this more useful and
I've just pushed a few minor cleanups to pinentry that shouldn't
interfere with the ssh use case you describe, but don't do anything
significant to fix the other problems mentioned here.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Gnupg-devel