pinentry's new window titles could be more (less?) informative

Werner Koch wk at
Fri Sep 29 11:00:51 CEST 2017

On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 20:03, rjh at said:

> So my question is, yes, I see what the intent is here: to give users
> some assurance their PIN is being requested by the program they expect.

Actually the reason I implemented this was to see the ssh invocation.  I
have a few cron jobs connecting to other boxes running and thus it is
interesting to see which kicked the pinentry.



Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20170929/df243d9b/attachment.sig>

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list