wks for sign-only keys

[Bernhard Reiter]

Am Freitag 11 Januar 2019 09:46:05 schrieb Erich Eckner:
> To avoid any confusions, I created the key without capability
> of encryption (no emails should be sent to that address - besides of
> course wks emails).

An interessting question then is: What do you do, if you an email is send to 
this address? :) Even if you throw them away, being able to encrypt is 
important, because users may have send you some interesting information.
If you don't want email send at all, why offering an email address?

> If it would add much complexity to allow for uploading sign-only keys, I
> guess, I'm fine with replacing the key with one that can also encrypt

Given my assumptions above this maybe the better solution for you anyway. ;)

Regards,
Bernhard

-- 
www.intevation.de/~bernhard   +49 541 33 508 3-3
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998
Geschäftsführer Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/attachments/20190111/fbf18649/attachment.sig>