[PATCH gnupg] doc: update default-new-key-algo to ed25519

Bernhard Reiter bernhard at intevation.de
Wed Nov 22 09:15:02 CET 2023

> The problem for me is "the value of what was the previous default" is
> awkward; I suggest instead saying "the previous default value" there.

New patch attached, thanks.

> Is this an awkward phrasing to optimize TeX typesetting?

I don't know as I somehow kept the structure of the original sentence.

Feel free to improve the phrasing as the important part is that the chance
in default is reflected here. (A potential additional improvement could be 
that it is generated into that place of the documentation, so it is not 
forgotten next time the default is changed.)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0003-doc-update-default-new-key-algo-to-ed25519.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1389 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/attachments/20231122/5b5cdee0/attachment.patch>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/attachments/20231122/5b5cdee0/attachment.sig>

More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list