Build requirements (was gpgmepy broken build)

Ingo Klöcker kloecker at kde.org
Mon May 5 16:44:16 CEST 2025


On Sonntag, 4. Mai 2025 20:17:08 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit Genes Lists 
wrote:
> Am starting to feel like gpgmepy is kind of abandonware? Maybe its time
> to move on.

The Python bindings have been neglected for some time (except for minor 
maintenance). Paul has just started to change this.

Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/attachments/20250505/04eb0166/attachment.sig>


More information about the Gnupg-devel mailing list