GNU GPL for doc -- Why?

Werner Koch wk@gnupg.org
Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:11:47 +0100


On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, IIDA Yosiaki wrote:


> If you you mean copyleft, not GNU GPL, then I understand.
Hmm, where is the difference? The GPL is one possible implementation of a copyleft style license. Which point of the GPL does make you think it is not appropriate for documentation? Werner