[Fwd: Re: GnuPG 0.9.10 interoperability with PGP 6.0.2i and 6.5.1]

[Maitre Jedi Yoda]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Have you forced the V3 signs like it's written in the FAQ?

I've done the same test as you and i haven't god any problems 

On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Mjedi Yoda wrote:

> 
> On 21 Aug 1999, Christophe Labouisse wrote:
> 
> > > User A is using GnuPG 0.9.10 on Linux.
> > > User B is using PGP 6.0.2i on Win98.
> > > User C is using PGP 6.5.1 on Linux.
> > > User A can read encrypted and/or signed messages from user B.
> > > User B can only read encrypted messages from user A, but cannot verify
> > > signatures from user A.  (The error is `bad signature from....')
> > > User C has the same problem as user B wrt user A.
> > I post a bug report for a similar problem a couple of days ago. I find 
> > out that gnupg clear signatures cannot be verified by pgp 5.0i while
> > "not clear" signatures work. I finally find out that the problem came
> > from tab chars.
> 
> Alas, the file concerned (a posting I grabbed from rec.humor.funny...) has
> no tab characters (at least, I couldn't spot any using cat).  On deeper
> inspection, the problem affects both clear-signing and armoured signing. 
> 
> I have uploaded some files to my WWW site:
> 	http://www.mithlond.demon.co.uk/pjb/gnupg/testkey2.asc
> 	A public key.
> 
> 	http://www.mithlond.demon.co.uk/pjb/gnupg/test-cs.txt
> 	A clear-signed file.
> 
> 	http://www.mithlond.demon.co.uk/pjb/gnupg/test-as.asc
> 	An armoured signed file.
> 
> Can anyone determine why PGP6.x.x complains of a bad signature on these
> files?
> 
> Phil.
> 
> --
> Dr Phillip J. Brooke
> pjb@mithlond.demon.co.uk        http://www.mithlond.demon.co.uk/pjb/
> 
> --Multipart_Sat_Aug_21_12:24:55_1999-1--
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v0.9.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.60

iD8DBQE3w+IpeK5voE6BQNERAjvGAKCN16I2AFxaSFuosnDOETZy5m9L8QCeMzkx
9z1KfXf0ZsMNQnPekWKm20o=
=GpXJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----