[Fwd: Re: GnuPG 0.9.10 interoperability with PGP 6.0.2i and 6.5.1]

Maitre Jedi Yoda mjediyoda@multimania.com
Wed, 25 Aug 1999 14:31:29 +0200 (CET)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Have you forced the V3 signs like it's written in the FAQ?

I've done the same test as you and i haven't god any problems 

On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Mjedi Yoda wrote:


>
> On 21 Aug 1999, Christophe Labouisse wrote:
>
> > > User A is using GnuPG 0.9.10 on Linux.
> > > User B is using PGP 6.0.2i on Win98.
> > > User C is using PGP 6.5.1 on Linux.
> > > User A can read encrypted and/or signed messages from user B.
> > > User B can only read encrypted messages from user A, but cannot verify
> > > signatures from user A. (The error is `bad signature from....')
> > > User C has the same problem as user B wrt user A.
> > I post a bug report for a similar problem a couple of days ago. I find
> > out that gnupg clear signatures cannot be verified by pgp 5.0i while
> > "not clear" signatures work. I finally find out that the problem came
> > from tab chars.
>
> Alas, the file concerned (a posting I grabbed from rec.humor.funny...) has
> no tab characters (at least, I couldn't spot any using cat). On deeper
> inspection, the problem affects both clear-signing and armoured signing.
>
> I have uploaded some files to my WWW site:
> http://www.mithlond.demon.co.uk/pjb/gnupg/testkey2.asc
> A public key.
>
> http://www.mithlond.demon.co.uk/pjb/gnupg/test-cs.txt
> A clear-signed file.
>
> http://www.mithlond.demon.co.uk/pjb/gnupg/test-as.asc
> An armoured signed file.
>
> Can anyone determine why PGP6.x.x complains of a bad signature on these
> files?
>
> Phil.
>
> --
> Dr Phillip J. Brooke
> pjb@mithlond.demon.co.uk http://www.mithlond.demon.co.uk/pjb/
>
> --Multipart_Sat_Aug_21_12:24:55_1999-1--
>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v0.9.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.60 iD8DBQE3w+IpeK5voE6BQNERAjvGAKCN16I2AFxaSFuosnDOETZy5m9L8QCeMzkx 9z1KfXf0ZsMNQnPekWKm20o= =GpXJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----