L. Sassaman
Wed, 14 Jun 2000 20:15:16 -0700 (PDT)

Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 14 Jun 2000, Jade Nicoletti wrote:

> 1. question:
> Is it just not possible to use PGPfreeware and GnuPG together, or have configured
> anything wrong?
They work perfectly fine together.
> 2. question:
> when he sends me a signed message, it is not recognized as such by mutt. is this
> because of a PGPfreeware<->GnuPG incompatibily, a incorrect mutt configuration or
> something else?
Mutt refuses to recognise the standard signed message format, and instead uses the PGP/MIME format, which isn't widely supported. It is for this reason I don't use Mutt. I believe there are some procmail scripts to convert incoming messages into the kludgy PGP/MIME format, however.
> gpg should handle the SHA1 algorythm, shouln't it?
Yes, in fact, is must to be OpenPGP. __ L. Sassaman System Administrator | "If you chose not to decide, Technology Consultant | you still have made a choice" icq.. 10735603 | pgp.. finger:// | --Rush -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred. iD8DBQE5SEpMPYrxsgmsCmoRAsD9AJ4ugDfkRRtdhz9XIop/QX72NSNaJACgmiIe ELKUCwl/sI4PPEoNjzwxhQw= =vBrq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----