Problems with an expired key...

L. Sassaman
Thu, 16 Mar 2000 13:12:59 -0800 (PST)

Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Werner Koch wrote:

> On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, L. Sassaman wrote:
> > > around. Why can't GPG select the version of a public signature that
> > > has not expired?
> >
> > It ought to. Ask Werner.
> Seems that there is really a bug with expired keys. I'll look into
> it.
> > It is my opinion that PGP/MIME should not exist. Most of the list members
> > probably dislike it as well, though I doubt many share my extreme hatred
> > for it. ASCII-Armored messages are good.
> <holywar>
> RFC2015 is an Internet Standard, so that should be used. It has many
> advantages over the old ascii armor. It is the only way to sign or
> encrypt MIME mails - or do you still want to use uuencode?
> </holywar>
I'll concede that it is useful for encrypting MIME emails. But what is the point in usung PGP/MIME when you are sending non-MIME email? __ L. Sassaman System Administrator | "All of the chaos Technology Consultant | Makes perfect sense..." icq.. 10735603 | pgp.. finger:// | --Joe Diffie -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (GNU/Linux) Comment: OpenPGP Encrypted Email Preferred. iD8DBQE40U5hPYrxsgmsCmoRAkw3AJ44hjQkn9xAo+J557WEneij1Vq9mACeMyre zulnRDwUREtezglQV/YHUbk= =qAKk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----