24 Oct 2000 09:34:48 -0700
>>>>> "WD" == Wayne Davis <email@example.com> writes:
WD> The folks ate NAI/PGP have made the assertion that GPG has
WD> taken PGP and reverse engineered it in order to obtain the
WD> source fo GPG. Can you provide the GPG side of this story?
Hahaha! Not really much use in making a standard (RFC2440, is it?) if
you don't expect people to implement it.
I *guess* reading an RFC could count as reverse engineering in some
twisted sense. Look out for a DMCA lawsuit, coming to a city near you!
/\____/\ Mr. Bad <firstname.lastname@example.org>
\ / Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/ | *Stay*Real*Bad*
| (X \x)
( ((**) "If it's not bad, don't do it.
\ <vvv> If it's not crazy, don't say it."
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of "unsubscribe" to email@example.com