open source

[Mr.Bad]

>>>>> "WD" == Wayne Davis <waynesdavis@netscape.net> writes:

    WD> The folks ate NAI/PGP have made the assertion that GPG has
    WD> taken PGP and reverse engineered it in order to obtain the
    WD> source fo GPG.  Can you provide the GPG side of this story?

Hahaha! Not really much use in making a standard (RFC2440, is it?) if
you don't expect people to implement it.

I *guess* reading an RFC could count as reverse engineering in some
twisted sense. Look out for a DMCA lawsuit, coming to a city near you!

~Mr. Bad

-- 
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 /\____/\   Mr. Bad <mr.bad@pigdog.org>
 \      /   Pigdog Journal | http://pigdog.org/ | *Stay*Real*Bad*
 |  (X \x)   
 (    ((**) "If it's not bad, don't do it.
  \  <vvv>   If it's not crazy, don't say it."
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

-- 
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of  "unsubscribe"  to gnupg-users-request@gnupg.org