phil zimmerman on GPG

[John Saylor]

--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi

There was a "chat" with Mr. Z on a website recently [no URL, but I found
it through /. and could find it again if pressed]. People sent email and
he responded.

One questioner brought up GnuPG and he dissed it. Saying that the
modular design [plugable algorithms] was a weakness not shared by PGP.
He also said blowfish sucked [twofish is much better], and ElGamal was
weak [DSS better].

Did anyone else see this? Comments?

--=20
\js

Never draw fire; it irritates the people around you.=20

--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (FreeBSD)
Comment: http://people.ne.mediaone.net/jsaylor/public_key.txt

iD8DBQE5uYGcAX3OBMMUeFIRAtCyAKCNE3j9dF9UZSukVTNS5km9zhmdXQCeKS7q
gDe4vpQEw7k3Vc+8rmrJuEI=
=hdF/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd--

-- 
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of  "unsubscribe"  to gnupg-users-request@gnupg.org