[Announce] new gnupg snapshot

[RJ Marquette]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Frank Tobin wrote:

> I'm not clearly seeing why importing a secret key, alone, is any
> threat.

When I see this change to the program, I wonder how a new user will react:
"How do I, Joe Newbie, switching from pgp to gpg use my current keypair?  
Does this mean I have to generate a new keypair?  But I thought the two
were compatible!"

Is this *really* the best plan for overcoming the danger?  Something that
could cause a lot of confusion?

Unless I misunderstand the issue, which is entirely possible.

RJ  <G>  :)

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
RJ Marquette rj(at)rmarq.pair.com RSA:448B035F DSS:CB45C555
My PGP and Skating pages: http://rmarq.pair.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: pgpenvelope - http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/ftobin/resources.html

iD8DBQE6zlp10DB5TMtFxVURAlDbAJ9IGBRLeG+Q/q0RUlcmpDuRMXjpDQCg98zw
xAZK8Ig4S6MaGIbGwJUk0Sk=
=vFaf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----