[Announce] new gnupg snapshot

RJ Marquette rj@rmarq.pair.com
Sat Apr 7 02:11:01 2001


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Frank Tobin wrote:


> I'm not clearly seeing why importing a secret key, alone, is any
> threat.
When I see this change to the program, I wonder how a new user will react: "How do I, Joe Newbie, switching from pgp to gpg use my current keypair? Does this mean I have to generate a new keypair? But I thought the two were compatible!" Is this *really* the best plan for overcoming the danger? Something that could cause a lot of confusion? Unless I misunderstand the issue, which is entirely possible. RJ <G> :) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= RJ Marquette rj(at)rmarq.pair.com RSA:448B035F DSS:CB45C555 My PGP and Skating pages: http://rmarq.pair.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: pgpenvelope - http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/ftobin/resources.html iD8DBQE6zlp10DB5TMtFxVURAlDbAJ9IGBRLeG+Q/q0RUlcmpDuRMXjpDQCg98zw xAZK8Ig4S6MaGIbGwJUk0Sk= =vFaf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----