Mac OS X
Thu Aug 2 03:48:01 2001
frankly i don't see what all the fuss is about Zsh myself. and just what's
wrong the Bourne Shell?
On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Lars Hecking wrote:
> Nathan Heagy writes:
> > > One reason for badly supported platforms is often that the developers
> > > have no access to them. Worse if such platforms are sufficiently non-
> > > standard, e.g. crap like zsh in place of The Bourne Shell.
> > First, let's not start a shell holy war. Suffice to say noone with any
> > knowledge of shells would dismiss zsh as crap, especially in comparison to
> > the Bourne Shell.
> Sorry if this was misunderstood. I meant to refer to the fact that a
> non-compatible shell was chosen as /bin/sh. zsh is generally fine as
> an interactive shell.
> Gnupg-users mailing list