Mac OS X

[Nathan Heagy]

I replaced /bin/sh on OS X with Gnu Bash and configure works fine. It is
also *much* faster than zsh at running configure.

Now there is a problem compiling, but that sort of thing I can probably
sort out.


nathan




On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Mark Weaver wrote:

> frankly i don't see what all the fuss is about Zsh myself. and just what's
> wrong the Bourne Shell?
>
> --
> daRcmaTTeR
>  =/\=???
>       |%C++
>
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Lars Hecking wrote:
>
> > Nathan Heagy writes:
> > > >  One reason for badly supported platforms is often that the developers
> > > >  have no access to them. Worse if such platforms are sufficiently non-
> > > >  standard, e.g. crap like zsh in place of The Bourne Shell.
> > >
> > > First, let's not start a shell holy war. Suffice to say noone with any
> > > knowledge of shells would dismiss zsh as crap, especially in comparison to
> > > the Bourne Shell.
> >
> >  Sorry if this was misunderstood. I meant to refer to the fact that a
> >  non-compatible shell was chosen as /bin/sh. zsh is generally fine as
> >  an interactive shell.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gnupg-users mailing list
> > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
>