GNUPG / PGP / Java / hushmail.com
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 10:24:49 -0800 (PST)
Hrmm. This was because of the RSA patent. I thought the license was worded
such that it wouldn't matter now. I could be wrong.
What does the 2.3 license say?
On 18 Jan 2001, Florian Weimer wrote:
> "L. Sassaman" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > PGP prior to 5.x is free for whatever use.
> For PGP 2.6.3, the standard license from MIT covers only
> non-commercial use. In addition, the PGP documentation clearly states
> that in order to use PGP commercially, you have to obtain a version
> from ViaCrypt.
> So in fact, the 2.6.x situation is quite similar to the post-2.6.x
> situation (modulo s/ViaCrypt/NAI/, of course).
> Florian Weimer Florian.Weimer@RUS.Uni-Stuttgart.DE
> University of Stuttgart http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/
> RUS-CERT +49-711-685-5973/fax +49-711-685-5898
> Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
> with a subject of "unsubscribe" to email@example.com
Security Architect | "The only cure for
Technology Consultant | sadness is learning"
http://sion.quickie.net | --Thomas Jefferson
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of "unsubscribe" to firstname.lastname@example.org