Need to Fill in Missing ML Postings
John Bacalle
john@unixen.org
Tue Jan 30 13:02:34 2001
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
* Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org> [20010130 11:54]:
> Have a look at the archive. You can download all mails by month in
> mbox format.
Yes, thank you, now I got them. You're cooler than the average ML about
such forethought. One nit, Mailman is set with an overly aggressive
headers-trim setting at the moment. Every MIME-GnuPG signed posting on
the archive is mangled as a consequence of the MIME information's
absence. Including your postings, Werner. They look like this:
From wk@gnupg.org Thu Jan 25 10:27:04 2001
From: wk@gnupg.org (Werner Koch)
Date: Thu Jan 25 10:27:04 2001
Subject: [Announce] Mailing lists moved, part 2
Message-ID: <20010125094236.E15272@alberti.gnupg.de>
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1781
Lines: 54
--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello again!
Some folks asked me to sign important announcements like a move of a
mailing list. To stop any complaints, here is it again:
The GnuPG mailing lists have moved to a new server and are now
handeld by Mailman. You will find instructions on how to access the
Web based interface at the bottom of each mail and the DNS should
have catched up by today.
The new server is the same as the one which runs www.gnupg.org; so
if you are interesed you can compare the IP addresses. By looking
at the 'Received:' lines you will notice that you are posting to a
box called porta.u64.de (named after Giovanni Battista Porta
(1535-1615) and a typedef used in gpg) which does some spam checking
and then forwarding it to the ML server.
So, when I don't forget to hit the sign key, we can check whether
Mailman handles rfc2015 signatures correct.
Werner
--=20
Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
GNU Privacy Guard (http://www.gnupg.org)
Free Software Foundation Europe (http://www.fsfeurope.org)
[Please see X-* mail header for OpenPGP key info]
--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4d (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6b+b8bH7huGIcwBMRAgFiAKC450t6DjqTCLwcp/Op/G9r5+xWVQCdFGuj
56CWRheoNQwvfVgAQk+1so0=
=0jDP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT--
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-announce mailing list
Gnupg-announce@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-announce
Aside from that the rest looked well to a visual inspection. I d/l the
archive twice to double check. You should let the MIME information
remain, at the least. I'm partial to User-Agent, Mailer, X-Mailer
headers too, but I won't push hard.
John
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=zulu-badmime1
>From pzn@terra.com.br Thu Jan 4 13:11:54 2001
From: pzn@terra.com.br (Pedro Zorzenon Neto)
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 11:11:54 -0200
Subject: Changing pass phrase
Message-ID: <20010104111154.A4201@mantis.autsens.localnet>
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1128
Lines: 40
--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
When I created my keys, I chose a pass phrase very complex, with some ch=
aracters like =E3 =F5 =EA =B2 =A3, ...
Now, I changed my keyboard and in the new keyboard these characters are =
hard to use... So I'd like to change my pass phrase and continue to use the=
same key with other pass phrase. How do I do it?
Thanks
Pedro
--=20
Why don't you try 'Mutt' and 'GnuPG'?
Get my public key at http://www.keyserver.net
1024D/7274AA07 9F1F 1EBB 29A4 918D 2C5F FB9C 39C9 7963 7274 AA07
--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6VHaaOcl5Y3J0qgcRArgRAKCW9FQqI8ywz4057JeK7B/SeJ4o+ACgkTwS
m6MmeKJ/DvafeW2Oed0YzoI=
=Nqd1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+--
--
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of "unsubscribe" to gnupg-users-request@gnupg.org
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=zulu-badmime2
>From trappedvector@crosswinds.net Sat Jan 6 14:04:22 2001
From: trappedvector@crosswinds.net (Martin)
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 15:04:22 +0100
Subject: Newbie question: GnuPG and PGP
In-Reply-To: <3A56F046.45B382AD@ihug.com.au>; from jmsalvo@ihug.com.au on Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 10:15:34AM +0000
References: <3A56F046.45B382AD@ihug.com.au>
Message-ID: <20010106150422.A680@crosswinds.net>
Status: RO
Content-Length: 2316
Lines: 75
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Saturday, January 06, 2001 (CS:6.01.006) 10:15:34 [AM] (+0000)
Jesus M. Salvo Jr. [jmsalvo@ihug.com.au] wrote...
> First of, please cc me to my e-mail address at jmsalvo@ihug.com.au as I
> am not subscribed to the list.
Done
> Second of, I have read the GnuPG to PGP HOWTO:
>=20
> http://technocage.com/~caskey/gnupg/pgp2gnupg.html
ok...
> However, my problem is related to signing, which is not covered on the
> above.
?
=20
> * Using GnuPG, I encrypted a file to myself using my public key. I then
> tried to decrypt the same file with PGP using my private key (OK)
> * Using GnuPG, I signed a file to myself using my private key. I then
> tried to verify the same file with PGP ( THIS IS NOT OK )
I think this is a PGP 5/6 problem.
=46rom /opt/gnupg-1.0.4/doc/FAQ
5.5) Why is PGP 5.x not able to verify my messages?
PGP 5.x does not accept V4 signatures for data material but OpenPGP
requires generation of V4 signatures for all kind of data. Use the
option "--force-v3-sigs" to generate V3 signatures for data.
> * Using PGP, I encrypted a file to myself using my public key. I then
> tried to decrypt the same file with GnuPG using my private key ( OK )
> * Using PGP, I signed a file to myself using my private key. I then
> tried to verify the same file with GnuPG ( OK )
> Can anyone tell me what that ( sub 1024g/8613FF52 means and why is it
> not the same as below? I did not create a key pair in GnuPG. All I did
> was import everything.
Take a look at /opt/gnupg-1.0.4/doc/DETAILS
HTH mh
--=20
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -=
- -
Linux - the backbone of the internet
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -=
- -
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE6VyXmffxhyW5sNDERAnQ1AKCJhnSGAHTC9k7TjO+c6dLXAtLDYgCgzjj6
fpK2YC1sjY7UfGAvF2IEQrc=
=jbL0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ--
--
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of "unsubscribe" to gnupg-users-request@gnupg.org
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=zulu-badmime3
>From tyketto@wizard.com Wed Jan 10 03:10:29 2001
From: tyketto@wizard.com (A Guy Called Tyketto)
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 19:10:29 -0800
Subject: US export compliance
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.QNWS.0101091901140.20402-100000@thetis.deor.org>; from rabbi@quickie.net on Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 07:02:33PM -0800
References: <3A5BC47746.9A6ARICH@mail.lcsweb.net> <Pine.LNX.4.30.QNWS.0101091901140.20402-100000@thetis.deor.org>
Message-ID: <20010109191029.A71749@wizard.com>
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1511
Lines: 49
--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 07:02:33PM -0800, L. Sassaman wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jan 2001, Rich wrote:
>=20
> > It's not required since it is not a product of the US.
>=20
> The question is still valid, I believe, if he wants to export it from US
> computers.
If the question is still valid, I don't see why it would be a problem.=20
There is nothing in GnuPG that would violate US exportation laws. IDEA isn'=
t=20
included in the source, and RSA's license expired. Even if it hadn't, RSA=
=20
isn't even in the source, so there would still be nothing to violate export=
=20
laws.
BL.
--=20
Brad Littlejohn | Email: tyketto@wizard.com
Unix Systems Administrator, | tyketto@ozemail.com.au
Web + NewsMaster, BOFH.. Smeghead! :) | http://www.wizard.com/~tyketto
PGP: 1024D/E319F0BF 6980 AAD6 7329 E9E6 D569 F620 C819 199A E319 F0BF
--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE6W9KkyBkZmuMZ8L8RAufkAJ48lIRzKNJTHG3w6cqic6h3iPit4ACg6XP1
+sj9aYPt8i0D5eofuL1B8zM=
=g87x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--DocE+STaALJfprDB--
--
Archive is at http://lists.gnupg.org - Unsubscribe by sending mail
with a subject of "unsubscribe" to gnupg-users-request@gnupg.org
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--