effects and incompatibilities between GPG1.0.6 and PGP CKT 06
Sun Jul 8 18:01:01 2001
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Graham wrote:
> The Cyber Knights Templar (CKT) builds have been produced with NAI's
> knowledge and I assume their permission from PGP 5.x and they even
> have a version of PGP 2.6.x.
Not really. NAI produced the source code so that others may review it;
some people have used it to produce their own versions. NAI doesn't
endorse any of these unofficial compilations. In fact, I don't think they
like them at all (and who knows--it may be part of why they discussed not
releasing source code any longer), but they've never tried to stop anyone
who is producing them.
Johan: Thanks for the plug for my page. :) You're right, it probably is
incomplete (sad, given all the time I put into it), but I'm pretty
confident the page has very few missing.
RJ <G> :)
RJ Marquette rj(at)rmarq.pair.com RSA:448B035F DSS:CB45C555
My PGP and Skating pages: http://rmarq.pair.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: pgpenvelope - http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/ftobin/resources.html
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----