effects and incompatibilities between GPG1.0.6 and PGP CKT 06

RJ Marquette rj@rmarq.pair.com
Sun Jul 8 18:01:01 2001

Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 8 Jul 2001, Graham wrote:

> The Cyber Knights Templar (CKT) builds have been produced with NAI's
> knowledge and I assume their permission from PGP 5.x and they even
> have a version of PGP 2.6.x.
Not really. NAI produced the source code so that others may review it; some people have used it to produce their own versions. NAI doesn't endorse any of these unofficial compilations. In fact, I don't think they like them at all (and who knows--it may be part of why they discussed not releasing source code any longer), but they've never tried to stop anyone who is producing them. Johan: Thanks for the plug for my page. :) You're right, it probably is incomplete (sad, given all the time I put into it), but I'm pretty confident the page has very few missing. RJ <G> :) =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= RJ Marquette rj(at)rmarq.pair.com RSA:448B035F DSS:CB45C555 My PGP and Skating pages: http://rmarq.pair.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: pgpenvelope - http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/ftobin/resources.html iD8DBQE7SIKS0DB5TMtFxVURAoX1AJsFk0weke2LSDndjfnD3dVh6hbF5gCgyAYZ hW97StjqIlNuXtCTK6jVoXI= =XJPO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----