Trust (non-DB)

[Nick Andriash]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello Steve Butler,

On Monday, November 19 2001 at 08:33 AM PDT, you wrote:

> I am presuming we have some of both here.  Although, from the thread
> of this weekend I think the ranks of both have thinned <<grin>>.

Probably... and that's a shame, because it's those very discussions that
turn potential PGP/GPG Users away. Phil Zimmermann commented recently
about why PGP/GPG was not attractive to the 'masses', and I believe made
reference to the 'analness' regarding the threat model. I'm sorry that I
don't have the article's URL, but his comments rang true for me when
reading this particular thread. 


- -- 
Nick

   -=N.J. Andriash | Courtenay, B.C. Canada=-
Win 98SE | GnuPG v1.06 (MingW32) | Becky v2.00.07
___________________________________________________

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (MingW32) - GPGshell v2.10b18
Comment: Join PGP-Basics: PGP-Basics-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

iD8DBQE7+T5/xQKEdHuj/c4RAlUEAKC5rNsUA1labfImgOLl/rnfVO9d0gCgpJ70
Fle/A0BGt6aTUMwU4xgtXTE=
=VqoF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----